<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Paul Stanley, Voters And The Privilege Of Being Elected</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newscoma.com/2009/07/23/paul-stanley-voters-and-the-privilege-of-being-elected/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newscoma.com/2009/07/23/paul-stanley-voters-and-the-privilege-of-being-elected/</link>
	<description>Got A Two-Pack Habit And A Motel Tan</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 03:15:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://newscoma.com/2009/07/23/paul-stanley-voters-and-the-privilege-of-being-elected/comment-page-1/#comment-27865</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 15:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newscoma.com/?p=10070#comment-27865</guid>
		<description>It seems this problem affects a lot of Republicans.  Not that the Dems have fewer sex scandals, it is just that the Repubs have been shouting from the soap box of morality and thus they become blazing hypocrites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems this problem affects a lot of Republicans.  Not that the Dems have fewer sex scandals, it is just that the Repubs have been shouting from the soap box of morality and thus they become blazing hypocrites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Ensign Now Inspiring Copycat Crimes &#187; THE EARMARK</title>
		<link>http://newscoma.com/2009/07/23/paul-stanley-voters-and-the-privilege-of-being-elected/comment-page-1/#comment-27817</link>
		<dc:creator>John Ensign Now Inspiring Copycat Crimes &#187; THE EARMARK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 05:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newscoma.com/?p=10070#comment-27817</guid>
		<description>[...] and gentlemen, we give you State Senator Paul Stanley (R-TN).  This gay-bashing, abstinence-preaching legislator saw how far intern-related affairs had propelled Ensign and &#8212; presumably hoping to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and gentlemen, we give you State Senator Paul Stanley (R-TN).  This gay-bashing, abstinence-preaching legislator saw how far intern-related affairs had propelled Ensign and &#8212; presumably hoping to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Stanley&#8217;s Media Strategy : Post Politics: Political News and Views in Tennessee</title>
		<link>http://newscoma.com/2009/07/23/paul-stanley-voters-and-the-privilege-of-being-elected/comment-page-1/#comment-27814</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Stanley&#8217;s Media Strategy : Post Politics: Political News and Views in Tennessee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 23:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newscoma.com/?p=10070#comment-27814</guid>
		<description>[...] &#187;&#160;Paul Stanley, Voters And The Privilege Of Being ElectedPosted 9 hours [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &raquo;&nbsp;Paul Stanley, Voters And The Privilege Of Being ElectedPosted 9 hours [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Stanley&#8217;s Media Strategy : Post Politics: Political News and Views in Tennessee</title>
		<link>http://newscoma.com/2009/07/23/paul-stanley-voters-and-the-privilege-of-being-elected/comment-page-1/#comment-27813</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Stanley&#8217;s Media Strategy : Post Politics: Political News and Views in Tennessee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 23:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newscoma.com/?p=10070#comment-27813</guid>
		<description>[...] &#187;&#160;Paul Stanley, Voters And The Privilege Of Being ElectedPosted 9 hours [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &raquo;&nbsp;Paul Stanley, Voters And The Privilege Of Being ElectedPosted 9 hours [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grandefille</title>
		<link>http://newscoma.com/2009/07/23/paul-stanley-voters-and-the-privilege-of-being-elected/comment-page-1/#comment-27810</link>
		<dc:creator>grandefille</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 18:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newscoma.com/?p=10070#comment-27810</guid>
		<description>You are BOTH right. I commend you, &#039;Coma, for your superior commentary and you, Ms. Vixen, for making your point so succinctly.

And as for &lt;i&gt;“abstinence until marriage” for young people&lt;/i&gt;:

Does the good senator interpret that as meaning you can sex up anybody else that stands still long enough AFTER you&#039;re married? Because that&#039;s what it looks like from the cheap seats, bubba.

Y&#039;all don&#039;t even want me to get started on the slut-shaming mess that&#039;s started. (I&#039;ve been shouting most of the morning about it.) I&#039;d like to remind the senator, however, that a) he, and only he, has the greater obligation to act responsibly as both a man and a public servant because he is both married with children AND an employer, and b) you can&#039;t roll around in the mud and then cuss it for getting you dirty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are BOTH right. I commend you, &#8216;Coma, for your superior commentary and you, Ms. Vixen, for making your point so succinctly.</p>
<p>And as for <i>“abstinence until marriage” for young people</i>:</p>
<p>Does the good senator interpret that as meaning you can sex up anybody else that stands still long enough AFTER you&#8217;re married? Because that&#8217;s what it looks like from the cheap seats, bubba.</p>
<p>Y&#8217;all don&#8217;t even want me to get started on the slut-shaming mess that&#8217;s started. (I&#8217;ve been shouting most of the morning about it.) I&#8217;d like to remind the senator, however, that a) he, and only he, has the greater obligation to act responsibly as both a man and a public servant because he is both married with children AND an employer, and b) you can&#8217;t roll around in the mud and then cuss it for getting you dirty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: newscoma</title>
		<link>http://newscoma.com/2009/07/23/paul-stanley-voters-and-the-privilege-of-being-elected/comment-page-1/#comment-27805</link>
		<dc:creator>newscoma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newscoma.com/?p=10070#comment-27805</guid>
		<description>VV, you are absolutely right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VV, you are absolutely right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VideoVixen</title>
		<link>http://newscoma.com/2009/07/23/paul-stanley-voters-and-the-privilege-of-being-elected/comment-page-1/#comment-27804</link>
		<dc:creator>VideoVixen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newscoma.com/?p=10070#comment-27804</guid>
		<description>I live in Paul Stanley&#039;s district. As a constituent, what bothers me most is not the fact that he was cheating on his wife, or that he lied about it. Afterall, men and women do that all the time. What really bothers me is that as a proponent of &quot;abstinence until marriage&quot; for young people, Stanley stood in judgment of young men and women who choose to do what comes naturally. He once told me that he didn&#039;t think young people should have sex, that they should be encouraged to abstain and remain &quot;pure&quot;. At the same time he was apparently sexing up an intern in her early 20&#039;s. I guess he didn&#039;t encourage her to be abstinent...
It&#039;s the hypocrisy, stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live in Paul Stanley&#8217;s district. As a constituent, what bothers me most is not the fact that he was cheating on his wife, or that he lied about it. Afterall, men and women do that all the time. What really bothers me is that as a proponent of &#8220;abstinence until marriage&#8221; for young people, Stanley stood in judgment of young men and women who choose to do what comes naturally. He once told me that he didn&#8217;t think young people should have sex, that they should be encouraged to abstain and remain &#8220;pure&#8221;. At the same time he was apparently sexing up an intern in her early 20&#8217;s. I guess he didn&#8217;t encourage her to be abstinent&#8230;<br />
It&#8217;s the hypocrisy, stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
